Learn to Drive a Model T: Register for the Model T Driving Experience

14900k vs 7950x reddit

Dec 22, 2023 · As it stands now, you can purchase the i9-14900K for $580, while the 13900K, which is the same CPU, costs $550. The 7800X3D and 7950X3D have the same performance in gaming. Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps. So after watching tons of benchmarks online I've come to the conclusion that the 7800X3D is a "gaming" CPU and can definitely outperform the 14700K in framerates for certain games. Dec 27, 2023. Hello, Ill mainly use PC with those 2 CPUs for homelabs, running 3-4-5 VMs in the same time, program in the same time etc. Based on pugetbench it says up to ~20% increase in rendering but in reality, you probably on't see much of a difference. 14900k is better for high thread workloads or memory dependent workloads. The comparison here wasn't between rational price competitors, but fastest gaming CPU's from each brand. I'm on the fence about it right now because I know that the 13900K will have higher performance, but Intel CPU platforms do not last long. however if your doing other things like rendering stuff and 3d work than the 5950x seems like a better value for a 100bucks less it has more cores (performance) and does not lack gaming performance vs the 12900k. 2 GHz Intel Core i9 14900K with 24-cores against the 4. If you have an app that can fully load all 32 processing threads, a case can be made for the 7950X. The highest benchmarks for Factorio usually get there by way of high memory OC to increase memory bandwidth. You wouldn't compare a 13700k vs a 14900k, because they are different tiers of CPU for different usage. 7800x3d will still crush all games, and will crush 95% of consumer level productivity tasks. if you buying intel's best, get a custom loop. Intel's price competitor is 13700k, which is probably 4-5% slower than 14900k on average in gaming, same price as 7800X3D, and it beats it handily in multithreaded applications. Intel has no upgrade path since it’s on a dead socket, AMDs AM5 platform will be around for a few more generations, so 100% AMD and if gaming is all you’re worried about get a 7800x3d. Guess another reviewer will be rerunning their power scaling tests. 5 GHz and a boost clock speed of 5. theres a reason theres guides to shutting cores off for some chips to improve thermals/gaming performance. Faster 64-core speed. Please use our Discord server instead of supporting a company that acts against its users and unpaid moderators. Here are some passmark comparisons: cpu #threads full workload/single thread. Which makes Intel option almost the same price as AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and/or more expensive than Ryzen 7 7800X3D. And there is 16 of them. AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs. 13900K vs 7950x3D vs 7950x. They are VERY similar in this game, but Intel really needs pretty Productivity is a wash between the two. The M1 Ultra scores 24,000 vs the 13900Ks 36,600 and the 7950Xs 37,600. 13900K Pros: - Cheaper overall upgrade (cheaper Modo, can keep DDR4 Ram, Cheaper CPU by $100) - Slightly better performance overall, especially Single Core. Currently a 7900x and 13900k are roughly equal, with the 13900k having a slight edge. The 14700k, which isn't too far off the 14900k for gaming, would be a true competitor to the 7800X. 6000MHz CL30 is the RAM you want on AMD 7000 series. 14900k has twice as many threads as 7800X3D. While thats not exactly the same as going from 250W to 95W, If you look at the trend in the graph, a similar power scale down (230W -> 85W) would reduce performance by about 9-12. 2ghz 24 core, MSI Z790 MAG Tomahawk motherboard and 64gb DDR5 for $800. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X & Intel Core i9 14900K: Ubuntu 22. And to answer it, no. 04 vs. Currently I am running a Ryzen 9 5950X, and when I purchased my new computer, I opted for the i9-13900K. Price. 7950x or 79503dx for Production? Until two weeks ago I was set on a 14900K, 96GB 6400 DDR5 CL32, 4080 Super, x3 Nvme PC for video/photo editing. At a US Microcenter. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. For now I am leaning towards the 14900K because it is better by a bit for the productivity tasks i do (mostly compile with a bit of ML here and there) and for 1440p gaming it reached a higher ceiling with the 4090 than the 7950X. i9-11900k at 250W gets 14,949. 7800X3D - cheaper and faster than both of the alternatives you mentioned in your area of application. Intel® Core™ i9-14900K vs ryzen 9 7900x3d. It isn’t a handicap for Intel at all lmao. 2. AMD does seem more appealing to me long term because of the platform longevity. 0 GHz. They are the same CPU with different names. they should wait for the 30900ks and the 21090ti 512gb. Honestly it's up to you. If you want to stick with intel, 14900k. That's a different story. I don't remember any review showing the 7950X pass 100W in gaming on average, most were in the 80ish Watt range or lower, depending on resolution. When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance. There is no game that a 7950x3d or 14900ks has any meaningful gains over a 7800x3d at 4k. Or get a behemoth like the Asus ProArt case with a 420mm AIO water cooler and get the Intel 14900K. Make sure the bios is up to date and that you have the beefiest aio possible. Slightly faster turbo frequency. 14900K: +$200 more compared to 7900X. OTOH, many apps have single thread limitations, and to that end, the 14900K will be better. That argument immediately falls flat on its face since the 14700k is just 2% behind the 14900k in gaming while being 180 dollars cheaper. I've watched so many videos about Intel issues, but can't find new production benchmarks resulting from the nerf coming from motherboard manufacturers. This CPU is incredibly well-placed for a refresh. A 13900ks likely gives a roughly 5% boost over the 13900k like we saw in the previous generation. BigGirthyBob. The 7800X3D is the best cpu for gaming (yes it is better than both the 14900k and 7950X3D). no. It is also efficient out of the box, unlike the 7950x. I intend to buy this week. 14700K: +$50 more compared to 7900X. I would actually want at minimal a 360mm aio or even a 420mm aio if your case can fit it. Therefore Ryzen 9 7950x3D>i9 14900k. For actual production workloads, the actual single core speed tends to help more than the extra cache, and as you said, the 14700k tends to pull ahead slightly in general multi-core work too. there are good enough aio's, but you'd spend less getting just a decent waterblock and some soft tubing to still beat the best of best aio's The 7950x3d is a bad choice until it gets a proper thread director. Besides the efficiency cores on the 13900k are superior than what was in a i9 9900k normal cpu cores. Interestingly, the number of VS. To give you an idea how hard this cpu punches. CosmicDoberman. This is the largest and most active CS sub on Reddit. unless you are saving every last buck to get the 4090. Depending on your needs I d say amd. I'm looking to upgrade from an i5 11600k and ddr4 to ddr5 and either of those 2 cpus, or any suggestion from you guys, what are your thoughts? Current build : Asus prime b560 plus 3070 I5 11600k Corsair vengeance 32 gb ddr4 3200mhz Oct 22, 2023 · The Intel Core i9-14900K has a base clock speed of 3. Even though both of them have 32 threads, the 13900k has 16 efficiency threads and 16 full fat threads. Real life workloads might be different though. The 7950x has 32 full threads. The 13900k does have the highest power draw of any cpu though and is an end of the line socket whereas am5 has atleast one I saw some benchmarks for 4K gaming and it seems that the i9-13900K vs the 7950X3D are basically neck and neck. The 7950x3d has less cores and lower clock speeds but it’s a lot more power efficient and is built on a newer 5nm node compared to the 10nm from intel. Option 2: Intel Core i7-14700K at USD 348. And it costs $300 less. It has better performance in games and yes, higher power draw does mean higher temperatures so the 7900X3D would be cooler. Intel has a lot of ground to cover, looks like. Having said that, at a glance the systems look comparable. Intel Core i9-14900k: Appears to be more stable with fewer reported issues compared to the 7950X3D. A 240mm AIO will work well for the 7950X though. The 14900k slurps way more power under max loads, so cooling it cam be more of a challenge. 13900K Cons: - Very energy inefficient. The only situation where the X3D makes any sense is lower resolution, competitive gaming with super high end graphics cards. Although, it seems that the 7950X3D only performs better then the i9-13900K in lower resolutions such as 1440p and 1080p. This a mobile chip within spitting distance of both the 7950x and 14900k. Option 1: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at USD 440. The Intel Core i9-13900K has more physical cores and threads than AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X. This cpu may jave 8 cores less than the 14900k, but the 14900k has 16 e cores wich are useless most of the time, while only having 8 p cores. The 24 cores on the 14900k contain 8 powerful performance cores and 16 lower powered e cores. Intel i9 14900K Vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other 14900k is worth the +50$ if you use it for video editing. Dec 20, 2023 · In our testing at 1080p, the Ryzen 9 7950X led by only 2% over the Intel Core i9 14900K in terms of average framerate and lost by around 2% in terms of 1% lows. Our tests also showed the Ryzen 9 7950X consumes around 14% less power than the Core i9 14900K. Isn’t AMD’s best gaming CPU the 7950x 3D. Slightly lags behind the 7950X3D in terms of performance across various applications. The i9 14900k (640 euros) offers similar performance to the i9 13900KS (800 Euros) while being available for much less money. You have literally no reason to get a 14900K or a 7950X. 7800x3d is better. Pros. I already have the following parts purchased, just missing the processor, motherboard and video card. The 13900K is difficult to cool and a 240mm AIO will not get the most out of it (still 90-95% of the max though). U can either drop the tdp or undervolt. Then just take 13600k, and b660/690, and ddr4. The 7800x3d uses far less power than a 13900k for gaming, which is great if you’re concerned with energy costs, psu wattage headroom and cooling. 04 Performance phoronix. Intel Core i9-14900K. 18:38 is where code compilation benchmarks are shown. 关于Ryzen 9 7950X和Core i9-14900K与其他计算机组件的兼容性的信息:主板(寻找插座类型),电源装置(寻找功耗)等。在计划未来的计算机配置或升级现有的计算机时很有用。 请注意,一些处理器的功耗可以远远超过其标称的TDP,即使没有超频。 I've done a bit of research and the Intel i9 13900K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X are pretty similar. From a cost perspective it makes more sense because the drop in upgrades along the way and the performance difference between the two isn't really ground breaking. Option 2: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at USD 360. If it had one, though, it would be a great choice for an all round cpu. There should no longer be a 7950x vs x3d. 8 minutes faster than the 7950X and consumed a hell of a lot more power while doing it. 7800x3d then. $589. However, it is power-hungry and tends to run hot. Build Help. hes accurate and never salty, we should trust him. - high idle power around 66-75w ! (this is crazy) ,which 13900K (s) : idle 9w ! 7950x also use at idle 60w+ Avg! so AMD cant fix it after 6 months?! Oct 19, 2023 · Intel Core i9-14900K. and maybe sometimes game on it (gaming is the least important thing for me). I don't use buffer sizes larger than 128 as there's a noticeable input delay, so the X3D was the right choice fo rme. Is the 14700K even better than 7900X for productivity and is the 14900K worth spending $200 extra over the 7900X. I have recently purchased a custom built PC as I am looking to do a complete overhaul from my current gaming PC. The US-based chipmaker is dropping the “i” in “Core i9,” “Core i7,” “Core i5” and “Core i3”. 100W shouldn't matter much aside from a few edge cases. The 13900k bested the 7950x is chromium compile by ~2 minutes in Gamers Nexus’ test. ago. Roughly what is the performance difference in percentage between those CPU in the title. Thanks in advance. 7950x 7950X3D. fybyfyby - Saturday, January 7 7900X3D is definitely the better option. The biggest argument for the 7950x is that the platform is newer, which has already been mentioned. However, theres a bit of an issue with it from the reviews, which is that allegedly the 7950x3D doesnt do so hot when it lands the game on the non 3d cache cores, and the CPU does weird things to park the non 3d cores. 04 Performance. DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. The power difference, however, IS noticeable. Every time. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now AMD Ryzen 9 7950X & Intel Core i9 14900K: Ubuntu 22. 7950X 38 218. I upgraded from R7 2700X to 7950X and the only case where i see a difference is with multiframe rendering on motion design projects. Pros : + support 2025+. 13900K 2 278. no surprise there, the 7800x3d is a gaming cpu and not a productivity cpu really. My thinking is theoretically a 7950x3d will give a 10% improvement in gaming, but a 13900ks will give a 5% improvement in productivity tasks on average. Faster OC 64-core speed. i9 13900kf or Ryzen 9 7950X? (Blender and video editing) Hardware. If your primary use is production workloads, the 7950x is slightly faster in that regard at the cost of some gaming performance and has better power efficiency when under all-core loads (because it has 8 less physical cores). Nvidia for Ray tracing cuda and Dlss. However, the 13900K is slightly faster at gaming (the 7950X is also plenty fast). Feb 22, 2024 · Up to 192 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Core i9-14900K, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 83. This video pretty much tells you everything you need to know. That’s +51% performance at -74% power in 2 generations. Benchmarks dont mean everything when comparing 2 cpus. Intel Core i9 14900KS. It also draws half the power (140W vs 282W) that the 14900K does - which means less heat, and therefore less noise. 4% less performance at nearly 50% lower power draw (vs 170W), and generally, lower temps. Discussion. I'm looking to upgrade my CPU to either the 13900K or the 7950x coming from a 10900k. So before reviews and testing came out, i was almost completly decided on the 7950x3D. * 100GB/s of memory bandwidth is a formidable spec. I work as a video game artist so I'm looking at both of those sides- high end gaming and using programs like Unreal Engine i honestly think the 12900k is great but the 5800x3d will be the fastest gaming processer hands down and the 5950x is simply overkill for just gaming. The new gen motherboards are also much better. 24. Keep rest of the money and upgrade to "8800x3d" when it's out. According to the Anandtech article that compared power scaling of 7950X and 13900K, 7950X lost 6. Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. I'm wanting to take advantage of the bundle deals at my local micro center and down to these two options: AMD Ryzen 9 7900x 4. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. But it also does codec av1 decoding if you require it. Cities Skylines 2, once you create a good sized city. Intel rates their 14900k at 89GB/s. 2 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with 16-cores. The 7950x3d or 14900ks absolutely stomps the 7800x3d, because that game is CPU bound. The 13900K was 1. Note: Reddit is dying due to terrible leadership from CEO /u/spez. If a game can take advantage of the extra cores, then it will beat the 7800x3d. Can't comment on the 14900K, but most of the OC headroom with the 7950X3D is in your ability to keep it as cool as possible, and - to a lesser extent - hit a decent FCLK to MCLK in the silicon lottery (Curve Optimiser is also helpful, but only if you can keep the chip cool in the first place). This is what I do and I believe is the best possible choice for such a use case. I’d probably go with a 7700x or 14600k for all round use that isn’t power hungry like a 14900k or 7950x. ricenoodlestw. the x3d parts aren't bad, but the 7900x3d is a bit of a poor balance, and the other two are opposite extremes. If I do get the 7950X3D, I plan on disabling the CCD that doesn’t have v-cache. Reply reply. Basically I use the computer to work and play. Take your 7950X and use it with handbrake to transform your UHD movies into a pre-encoded 1080p rips. According to a report by The Verge, Intel is planning to sell three tiers of consumer chips The fact that the 14900k is better at non-gaming tasks is great on paper, but in practice that’s only an advantage if you actually run applications in which that extra performance is noticeable. Stop stressing about 'upgrade path', as it's for work and you can pick up a good Z board for less than $200, and simply sell your old board. These CPU's are the best for hybrid gaming/productivity workloads, period. 14900 or 7800x3d I would say, tarkov really likes the hugh amounts of cache in the x3d variants. 2x16GB is enough for any game that exists and probably will exist. Much faster base frequency. Note: AMD DDR5 RAMs & Motherboards are currently slightly cheaper than Intel ones. The power figures they show for this are PPT limits, aka actual power draw. 3% CB R23 performance going from 230W to 105W. Take note new players who're worried about their performance in city. 10 vs. 5% faster than the $589 Core i9-13900K in multi-threaded workloads at both stock and overclocked settings, which is close enough to consider a tie. These benchmarks look to be designed to test the differences between ubuntu versions, not the CPUs, so it might not be a valid head-to-head comparison between the different hardware. Either you settle for a 7700X (faster thant he 7800X3D for data science) and use your SFF case. Then there's the 13900KF for $520. If you're open to AMD, the 7950x is faster in most workstation tasks and more efficient. It's a measurable difference, but the insane power draw combined with the difficulty of keeping the 13900K cool comes close Crimtos. For anyone else interested in what the names will be switching to: Intel is reportedly changing the branding of its processors. Meteor lake mobile 28w leaks are putting out about 12,000 on geekbench 6. There is a total of 24 compared to AMD's 16. if you need an i9 $50 more isnt much money. Star Citizen can easily ramp up to 32GB after 15 minutes in game and it's hard to tell if any of Stumped on a tech problem? Ask the community and try to help others with their problems as well. 04 Linux Performance subreddit was temporarily private as part of a joint protest to Music production. r/pcmasterrace. You can expect to pay $589 / £448 The 14900k is going to be better at gaming than the 7800x3d is at productivity, although I believe there are a few exceptions. Also intel and amd architecture is very very different. Differences. I’m not sure how that compares to AMDs 16 cores on the 7950x3d. But, when you stack the 14900k against AMD's heavy lifters for multitasking, like the Ryzen 9 line-up, suddenly the comparison doesn't seem so 14900k or 7950x might just be overkill for your use cases and could be under utilised. The efficiency threads are there to save power and hence are less powerful than actual threads. At the time of writing this comparison, the 7950X is around $60 cheaper than the Core i9. 5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7950X with 16-cores. 13600 , 13600k , 13700 , 14600 , 14600k , 14700 can be cooled with 240mm aio. Here's the price difference between the builds for me: 7900X. Sweet-spot performance really is taking big steps forward these days. 2 GHz and a boost clock speed of 6. Another point is that the 7900X3D is on the AM5 platform which will continue to get support and new CPUs till atleast 2026 whilst the 14700 is on Intel’s LGA1700 which is a dead Simple, 14600k, 14700K or 14900K. $799. The flagship offerings from Intel and AMD don’t exactly come cheap, so keep that in mind when pricing up 14900K vs 7950X from the jump. 2 GB/s enabled. + lower power draw gaming than 13900k (s) Cons: - good only at ubisoft games but others game not perform well. Review. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. Other than that, I am debating between a 14900k, 14700k and a 7950x, in my head I am thinking go with the 7950x because the AM5 platform has life where as the 14700k is EOL. What a waste of a test with only 32GB and not 64GB. Characteristic. 1 JBOD enclosure running DrivePool software and you're done. Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: LGA 1700's last flagship compared to AM5's first xda-developers comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment 14900K (nerfed) vs. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. 1600w would allow for the Intel arc card. I've also seen that the 13900K is better for gaming whereas the 7950X is better for productivity stuff, like 3D rendering etc. The Core i9-14900K is just slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X, but is much worse in efficiency and long-term value. Is anybody out there who has access to CS2 and is able to compare the performance of the 13900k vs. And for a very large number of people, it won’t be. In terms of pricing, the Intel Core i9-14900K is slightly cheaper than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. how well it does at the same limits as Zen 3 Computerbase tested this. GoldkingHD. Reason I don’t think 7900x3d is eligible here is that the processor has two separate ccds which only one ccd is having the extra cache. Wow, this tidbit is impressive: i9-13900k at 65W gets 22,563 ok Cinebench R23 multi-core. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. 23. for strictly gaming nothing beats the 7800x3d. 7950X3D is king in low latency DAW benchmarks. Power consumption/heat won’t be a problem since if run within Intel limits it’s only a difference of 30W and i yep, lots of cores on 1 chip generates allot of heat. TLDR: the 7800x3d is better or equal in 90% of cases, uses much less power, and is a cheaper total cost than the 14900k. The ryzen has 16 p cores, so its better for gaming and content creation. The 7950X eats them up, only takes like 1-2 hours for a full encode and they are like 2-5 Gb is all. Some of the best CPUs on the market with 4090 still sees drops to 40fps in city. So far. 7 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14900K is priced at $589, while the AMD Ryzen 9 Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. and other thermal M3 MAX Geekbench listing. • 27 days ago. 7800X3D vs 14700K. Intels 10 nm process is different from tsmc’s 5nm process. Cinebench R23 Single core. Stop wasting money on ryzen 9 and i9 people. The 13900k and the 7950x trade blows in gaming, the differences depend on the game engine, but i’d probably edge out to the 13900k. R9-7950x 32 63418/4312. It has 16 cores, which is technically less than the 14900k, but the 14900k has 8p+16e cores and e cores are real slow. 3,999$ for a laptop with this chip is also pretty steep, so definitely not . com Open. moores law is dead has a source that the 2090ti might only be 3% lower than the 21090ti. Nov 22, 2022 · The $699 Ryzen 9 7950X is roughly 1. Realistically i9 14900k and 7900xtx combo. Wonder why that wasn’t used. #3. Intel Core i9-13900K. bad advice. • 8 mo. 170W. Apple silicon - like X3D CPUs - has a memory bandwidth advantage. The 7950x3d is almost as good as the 14900k, but I think it lags a bit in both gaming and productivity except in a few rare cases. 7800x3d - $450 7950x3d - $700 13900k — $560. Jan 6, 2023 · 7900x and 7950x should probably be run at 105W by default you get 6. 2 GHz Intel Core i9 14900KS with 24-cores against the 4. Fastest CPU today and for the LGA 1700 socket Put your 20 Tb drives in a USB 3. On the other side of the table, the Ryzen 7 But both 13900K and 12900K beat the 7950X in single core CB R23. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base clock speed of 4. Don’t forget about power consumption. I'm building a new computer, but I have doubts between the Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel I9 14900K processors. Nov 17, 2022 · 125W. A few days ago the company emailed me saying the chip was out of stock, and upgraded me to the i9-14900k free of charge. But this comes at the cost of it being consistently weaker in terms of things like encoding, rendering, and multitasking with handling Currently the 13900k even beats the 7950x in every way let alone the 7900x, and it's cheaper. Oct 18, 2023 · 14900K vs 7950X: Price. •. So, the 14900k will take the performance crown in gaming, that's ok (considering the fact that it does not have 3D cache) But, more importantly, at the same time it will also have great throughput/multi-core and raw single-core performance (probably by significant margin, much more than 2%). 5% for the 7950X. SergeJeante. 1200w would be enough for a single xx90 card. The above commenter mentioned the 14900k being “50% more expensive”. Also nothing over $650. Note that with Intel you can easily use 6400 ddr5 as well. It puts the buyer in a weird situation which almost makes the 13900k the better looking choice in most situations. Intel i9 14900k 3. The value is there. Has an unlocked multiplier. Neither. Most I was thinking about the ones in the title but any other suggestions would work I’m just looking to max out the fps at 4k ultra settings. eeee. I could get new 7950X from local website for about $470 (Im from eastern EU), and Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $300 more expensive than 7950X I 7800X3D vs 14900K vs 13900K in Star Citizen. We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3. but should also consider if its tik or a toc cycle too. OC'ed 14600k performs almost as good as 7950X in virtualization benchmarks. The 7950X doesn't have a 3D cache, it's a workstation CPU. 5ghz 12 core, Asus B650E-F motherboard and 64GB DDR5 for $600. 7950X 2 051. If you re getting 4090, 7950x should be the choice. Dec 27, 2023 · 174,240. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Any insights or advice on which processor would better suit my needs would be greatly appreciated. vm fp fm wt hq vo sk cz fl xc